Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Animals Protection Act of South Africa


Animals Protection Act




ANIMALS PROTECTION ACT

NO. 71 OF 1962

(ASSENTED TO 16 JUNE, 1962) (DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 01 DECEMBER 1962)

(Afrikaans text signed by the State President)

as amended by

General Law Amendment Act No. 102 of 1972

(with effect from 05 July 1972 - see title GENERAL LAW AMENDMENT ACTS)

Animals Protection Amendment Act, No. 7 of 1972

Animals Protection Amendment Act, No. 54 of 1983

Animals Protection Amendment Act, No. 20 of 1985

Animals Protection Second Amendment Act, No. 84 of 1985

Protection of Animals Amendment Act, No. 7 of 1991

Animal Matters Amendment Act, No. 42 of 1993





GENERAL NOTE



In terms of Proclamation No.R.45 of 8 August 1997, the administration of Act No. 71 of 1962 has been Assigned to the Minister for Agriculture and Land Affairs.





ACT





To consolidate and amend the laws relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals.





1. DEFINITIONS: In this Act, unless the content otherwise indicates:

"animals" means any equine, bovine, sheep, goat, pig, fowl, ostrich, dog, cat, or other domestic animal or bird, or any wild animal, wild animal, wild bird or reptile which is in captivity or under control of any person.

"Minister" means the Minister of Agriculture

"owner" in relation to an animal, includes any person having the possession, charge, custody or control of that animal.

"police officer" Includes a member of any force established under any law for the carrying out of police powers, duties or functions.

"veterinarian" means a person registered as such under the Veterinary and Para-Veterinary Professions Act, 1982. (Act No. 19 of 1982)





2. OFFENCES IN RESPECT OF ANIMALS - (1) Any person who:

(a) overloads, overdrives, overrides, ill-treats, neglects, infuriates, tortures or maims or cruelly beats, kicks, goads or terrifies any animal; or

(b) Confines, chains, tethers or secures any animal unnecessarily or under such conditions or in such a manner or position as to cause that animal unnecessary suffering or in any place which affords inadequate space, ventilation, light protection or shelter from heat, cold or weather; or

(c) Unnecessarily starves or under-feeds or denies water or food to any animal; or

(d) lays or exposes any poisoned fluid or edible matter or infectious agents except for the destruction of vermin or marauding domestic animals or without taking reasonable precautions to prevent injury or disease being caused to animals; or

(e) being the owner of any animal, deliberately or negligently keeps such animal in a dirty or parasitic condition or allows it to become infected with external parasites or fails to render or procure veterinary or other medical treatment or attention which he is able to render or procure for any such animal in need of such treatment or attention, whether through disease, injury, delivery of young or any other cause, or fails to destroy or cause to be destroyed any such animal which is so seriously injured or diseased or in such a physical condition that to prolong its life would be cruel and would cause such animal unnecessary suffering; or

(f) uses on or attaches to any animal any equipment, appliance or vehicle which causes or will cause injury to such animal or which is loaded, used or attached in such a manner as will cause such animal to be injured or become diseased or to suffer unnecessarily; or

(g) save for the purpose of training hounds maintained by a duly established and registered vermin club in the destruction of vermin, liberates any animal in such a manner or place as to expose it to immediate attack or danger of attack by other animals or by wild animals, or baits or provokes any animal or incites any animal to attack another animal; or

(h) liberates any bird in such a manner as to expose it to immediate attack or danger of attack by animals, wild animals or wild birds; or

(i) drives or uses any animal which is so diseased or so injured or in such a physical condition that it is unfit to be driven or to do any work; or

(j) lays any trap or other device for the purpose of capturing or destroying any animal, wild animal or wild bird the destruction of which is not proved to be necessary for the protection of property or for the prevention of the spread of disease; or

(k) having laid any such trap or other device fails either himself or through some competent person to inspect and clear such trap or device at least once each day; or

(l) Except under the authority of a permit issued by the magistrate of the district concerned, sells any trap or other device intended for the capture of any animal, including any wild animal (not being a rodent) or wild bird, to any person who is not a bona fide farmer; or

(m) Conveys, carries, confines, secures, restrains or tethers any animal -

(i) under such conditions or in such a manner or position or for such a period of time or over such a distance as to cause that animal unnecessary suffering; or

(ii) in conditions affording inadequate shelter, light or ventilation or in which such animal is excessively exposed to heat, cold, weather, sun, rain, dust, exhaust gases or noxious fumes; or

(iii) without making adequate provision for suitable food, potable water and rest for such animal in circumstances where it is necessary; or

(n) without reasonable cause administers to any animal any poisonous or injurious drug or substance; or

(o) [Para. (o) Deleted by s. 2 of Act No. 42 of 1992.]

(p) being the owner of any animal, deliberately or without reasonable cause or excuse, abandons it, whether permanently or not, in circumstances likely to cause that animal unnecessary suffering; or

(q) causes, procures or assists in the commission or omission of any of the aforesaid acts or, being the owner of any animal, permits the commission or omission of any such act; or

(r) by wantonly or unreasonably or negligently doing or omitting to do any act or causing or procuring the commission or omission of any act, causes any unnecessary suffering to any animal; or

(s) kills any animal in contravention of a prohibition in terms of a notice published in the Gazette under subsection (3) of this section, shall, subject to the provisions of this Act and any other law, be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding twelve months or to such imprisonment without the option of a fine .

(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1) the owner of any animal shall be deemed to have permitted or procured the commission or omission of any act in relation to that animal if by the exercise of reasonable care and supervision in respect of that animal he could have prevented the commission or omission of such act.

(3) The Minister may by notice in the Gazette prohibit the killing of an animal specified in the notice with the intention of using the skin or meat or any other part of such animal for commercial purposes.



2A. Animal fights - (1) Any person who -

(a) possesses, keeps, imports, buys, sells, trains, breeds or has under his control an animal for the purpose of fighting any other animal;

(b) baits or provokes or incites any animal to attack another animal or to proceed with the fighting of another animal;

(c) for financial gain or as a form of amusement promotes animal fights;

(d) allows any of the acts referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c) to take place on any premises or place in his possession or under his charge or control;

(e) owns, uses or controls any place or premises or place for the purpose or partly for the purpose of presenting animal fights on any such premises or place or who acts or assists in the management of any such premises or place, or who receives any consideration for the admission of any person to any such premises or place; or

(f) is present as a spectator at any premises or place where any of the acts referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c) is taking place or where preparations are being made for such acts, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years.

(2) In any prosecution in terms of subsection (1) it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that an animal which is found at any premises or place is the property or under the control of the owner of that premises or place, or is the property or under the control of the person who uses or is in control of the premises or place.

(3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, a magistrate's court shall have jurisdiction to impose any penalty provided for in this section.





3. Powers of court - (1) Whenever a person is convicted of an offence in terms of this Act in respect of any animal, the court convicting him may in addition to any punishment imposed upon him in respect of that offence -

(a) Order such animal to be destroyed if in the opinion of the court it would be cruel to keep such animal alive;

(b) Order that the person convicted be deprived of the ownership of such an animal;

(c) Declare the person convicted to be unfit to own or be in charge of any animal, or of any animal of a specified kind, for a specified period;

(d) Make any order with regard to such animal as it deems fit to give effect to any order or declaration made under any of the preceding paragraphs.

(2) Any person who is found in possession or in charge of any animal in contravention of a declaration made in terms of paragraph (c) of sub-section (1), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties prescribed in sub-section (1) of section two.





4. Power of court to award damages - (1) Whenever any person is convicted by a magistrate's court of an offence under this Act and it is proved that such person has by the commission of that offence caused loss to any other person or that any other person has as the result of such offence incurred expense in providing necessary veterinary attention or treatment, food or accommodation for any animal in respect of which the offence was committed or in caring for such animal pending the making of an order by the court for the disposal thereof, the court may, on application by such other person or by the person conducting the prosecution acting on the instructions of such other person, summarily enquire into and determine the amount of the loss so caused or expense so incurred and give judgement against the person convicted and in favour of such for the amount so determined, but not exceeding an amount of R5 000.

(2) Any such judgement shall have effect as if it had been given in a civil action duly instituted before such court.

(3) The provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply in respect of -

(a) any costs incurred in connection with the custody of an animal seized in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977), for the purposes of a prosecution in terms of this Act; and

(b) any costs incurred in connection with the destruction of an animal in terms of an order under paragraph (a) of sub-section (1) of section three and the removal and burial or destruction of the carcass.





5. When police officer may destroy any animal - (1) Whenever a police officer is of the opinion that any animal is so diseased or severely injured or in such a physical condition that it ought to be destroyed, he shall, if the owner be absent or refuses to consent to the destruction of the animal, at once summon a veterinarian or, if there is no veterinarian within reasonable distance, two adult persons whom he considers to be reliable and of sound judgement, and if such veterinarian or adult person after having duly examined such an animal certify that the animal is so diseased or so severely injured or in such a physical condition that it would be cruel to keep it alive, such police officer may without the consent of the owner destroy the animal or cause it to be destroyed with such instruments or appliances and with such precautions and in such a manner as to inflict as little suffering as practicable.

(2) Any police officer who destroys any animal or causes it to be destroyed in the absence of the owner shall, if such owner's name and address are known, advise him of the destruction, and where the destruction of any animal takes place on any place or public road shall, subject to the provisions of the Animal Disease Act, 1984 (Act No. 35 of 1984), remove the carcass or cause it to be removed there from.

(3) A veterinarian may in respect of any animal exercise the powers conferred by sub-section (1) upon a police officer without summoning another veterinarian, police officer or any other person, and in respect of such of exercise of those powers the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply.

(4) Any expenses, which may reasonably incurred by any police officer or veterinarian in carrying out the provisions of this section may be recovered from the owner of the animal in question as a civil debt.

(5) It shall be a defence to an action brought against any person arising out of the destruction of an animal by him or with his authority, to prove that such animal was so severely injured or so diseased or in such a physical condition that it would have been cruel to have kept it alive, and that to summon a police officer or follow the procedure prescribed in this section would have occasioned unreasonable delay and unnecessary suffering to such animal.





6. Pound master may recover expenses - Any pound master shall be entitled to recover from the owner of any impounded animal any reasonable expenses necessarily incurred by him in rendering or providing veterinary or medical attention for such animal.





7. Owner may be summoned to produce animal for inspection by court - (1) A court trying any person for an alleged offence under this Act may summon the owner of that animal in respect of which such offence is alleged to have been committed to produce that animal at a time and place stated in the summons for inspection by the court.

(2) Any person who without satisfactory excuse fails to comply with a summons issued in terms of sub-section (1) shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties prescribed in sub-section (1) of section two.





8. Powers of officers of society for prevention of cruelty to animals - (1) If authorized thereto by writing under the hand of the magistrate of a district, any officer of any society for the prevention of cruelty to animals may in that district -

(a) Without warrant and at any time with the consent of the owner or occupier, or failing such consent on obtaining an order from a magistrate, enter any premises where any animal is kept, for the purpose of examining the conditions under which it is so kept;

(b) Without warrant arrest any person who is suspected on reasonable grounds of having committed an offence under this Act, if there is reason to believe that the ends of justice would be defeated by the delay in obtaining a warrant;

(c) On the arrest of any person on a charge of an offence under this Act, seize any animal or thing in the possession or custody of that person at the time of the arrest and take it forthwith to a police officer, who shall deal with it in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977);

(d) Exercise in respect of any animal the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section five upon a police officer and in respect of such exercise of those powers, the provisions of the said section shall mutatis mutandis apply.

(2) Any authority granted under sub-section (1) may at any time for good cause be revoked by the magistrate of the district.

(3) An officer to whom authority has been granted under sub-section (1) shall, when required to do so in the exercise of his powers, produce that authority for inspection.

(4) Any person who wilfully obstructs, hinders or resists an officer authorized under sub-section (1) in the exercise of the powers conferred upon him or conceals any animal or thing with an intent to defeat the exercise of such powers, or who upon demand fails to give his name and address to such officer, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties set out in sub-section (1) of section two.





9. Costs may be awarded against vexatious complainant - If at the trial of any person on a charge of an offence under this Act, the court is satisfied that any person or body has without reasonable cause and vexatiously lodged or caused to be lodged the complaint which led to such trial, it may award costs, including attorney and client costs, on the magistrate's court scale, against such person or body as if the proceedings were civil proceedings between the accused and such person or body.





10. Regulations - (1) The Minister may make regulations relating to -

(a) The method and form of confinement and accommodations for any animal or class, species or variety of animals, whether travelling or stationary;

(b) Any other reasonable requirements, which may be necessary to prevent cruelty to or suffering of any animal;

(c) The seizure, impounding, custody or confining of any animal due to any condition of such animal, the disposal or destruction of such animal and the recovery of expenses incurred in connection therewith from the owner of such animal; and

(d) Generally such matters as are required for the better carrying out of the objects and purposes of this Act.

(2) Such regulations may prescribe penalties for contravention thereof or failure to comply therewith not exceeding a fine of R4 000 or imprisonment for a period of twelve months.





11. Repeal of laws - The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1914 (Act No. 8 of 1914), the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1914, Amendment Act, 1922 (Act No. 10 of 1928), and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Amendment Act, 1949 (Act No. 28 of 1949), are hereby repealed.





12. Short title and commencement - This Act shall be called the Animals Protection Act, 1962 and shall come into operation on a date to be fixed by the State President by proclamation in the Gazette.





ANIMAL MATTERS AMENDMENT ACT, 1993

ACT NO. 14, 1993 16 APRIL 1993

ANIMAL MATTERS AMENDMENT ACT, 1993

(Assented to 25 March 1993) (Government Gazette 16 April 1993)

(Afrikaans text signed by the State President)

To provide for directions in respect of injuries caused by animals: to amend the Animals Protection Act, 1962, so as to further regulate the prohibition of animal fights: and to provide for matters connected therewith.

Be it enacted by the State President and the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa as follows:





Directions in respect of injuries caused by animals

1. (1) Any person as a result of whose negligence an animal causes injury to another person, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years.

(2) Whenever a person is convicted of an offence in terms of subsection (1), the court convicting him may in addition to any punishment imposed upon him in respect of that offence -

(a) make any order relating to the removal, custody, disposal or destruction of the animal concerned and the recovery of any costs incurred in connection therewith;

(b) declare the person convicted to be unfit, for a specified period, to own a certain kind of animal or an animal of a specific breed or to have it under his control or in his custody;

(3) Subsection (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply if any person -

(a) as a result of whose negligence an animal causes the death of another person is found guilty of an offence with regard to such negligence;

(b) as a result of whose deliberate action an animal causes the death of or injury to another person is found guilty of an offence with regard to such action.

(4) The Minister of Justice may from time to time, with the concurrence of the Minister of State Expenditure, appropriate funds to a society for costs incurred relating to the removal, custody, disposal or destruction of an animal.

(5) (a) A person who has in terms of subsection (2)(b) been declared unfit, for a specified period, to own a certain kind of animal or an animal of a specific breed or to have it under his control or in his custody, shall, if at the time of the declaration he owns or has under his control or in his custody such an animal and such animal is not destroyed in terms of subsection (2) (a), within 14 days from the date on which such declaration was made, make alternative arrangements for the caring of the animal for the period for which he is declared unfit to own such an animal or to have under his control or in his custody.

(b) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (a), any person who owns or has under his control or in his custody an animal in contravention of a declaration made in terms of subsection (2) (b), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year.

(6) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, a magistrate's court shall have jurisdiction to impose any penalty, which is provided for in this section.





Short Title

2. This Act shall be called the Animal Matters Amendment Act, 1993


Adoption Requirements and Fees

Here are a few websites where you can find more information on Adoption Requirements and Adoption Fees in South Africa.


DARG: Domestic Animal Rescue Group

WetNose Animal Rescue Centre

Adopt a Pet

Barking Mad


SPCA numbers in South Africa

Why is Reporting Animal Cruelty Important?

Some people do not want to report animal cruelty because they do not realize that the action is a crime or they are afraid to report cruelty committed by a friend or neighbor. However, reports often can be made anonymously.
Here are just a few reasons why reporting animal cruelty is important:
  • To help an animal at risk
  • To alert law enforcement agencies to crimes that may otherwise go uninvestigated
  • To document a pattern of behavior for repeat offenders
  • To prevent future violence to animals and to people.
Studies have shown strong links between animal cruelty and domestic violence, child abuse and violent crimes.

Whom Should You Call?








Suspended Jail Term for Owners of Starved St Bernard

The owners of a starving dog who is thought to have been so hungry she ate rubbish have been given a suspended jail sentence.
The St Bernard called Marley was found dead in the back garden of a home in Roydon, Essex, after an RSPCA inspector was alerted.

No food in Marley's stomach - just rubbish
A post mortem examination revealed she had no fat reserves and weighed just 32kg - a fifth of which was the weight of her skin.
There was no food in her stomach, indicating she had not been fed for at least 24 hours, but there were pieces of plastic or rubber where the hungry dog is thought to have been scavenging for rubbish to eat.

Suspended jail sentence and lifetime ban on keeping animals

Her owners, Nadine and Alan Lewis, pleaded guilty to a charge of causing unnecessary suffering by failing to investigate and address their pet's poor condition.
 
They were: 
  • given an 18-week prison sentence suspended for a year
  • disqualified from keeping animals for life
  • ordered to pay £500 each towards RSPCA legal costs.
Alan Lewis, 48, was also ordered to carry out 160 hours of unpaid work and Nadine Lewis, 41, was given a curfew order for a month.

They were sentenced at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Tuesday, 3 April. They had pleaded guilty at a previous hearing.
 
Grim discovery by RSPCA inspector
'It was shocking - she was literally skin and bones'
RSPCA Inspector Steve Reeves found Marley's emaciated body in the couple's back garden on 9 January this year. He said:

"It was shocking. She was literally skin and bones.
"A post mortem examination showed she had a tumour on her thyroid gland which would have caused her appetite to increase and any food she was getting not to be digested properly.

"A visit to the vets would have picked this condition up and she could have been treated. But essentially she was starving because she didn't get the right nutrition.
"She had pieces of plastic in her stomach where she had probably been eating any old rubbish to satisfy her hunger."

Marley suffered because owners failed to seek veterinary advice
Tragically Marley's thyroid problem could have been treated with medication or surgery. But instead she is thought to have suffered for at least four weeks before her death.

In mitigation the couple said they had taken in Marley a few months earlier and she was in a poor condition but they were trying to feed her up.
Inspector Reeves added:

“It was obvious that Marley was thin. Her owners had asked advice of friends and other dog owners, but they failed to ask the experts – a vet.
Anyone who owns an animal has a legal responsibility to care for them, including taking them to a vet if they are ill.”


http://www.care2.com/news/member/100041282/3226364

There are no winners in a dog fight




An injured dog sits in a Genesee County Animal Control van during an investigation into a suspected dog fighting ring by animal control and the Genesee County Sheriff Department at a house on East Bishop Avenue in Flint on Monday. Authorities found five dogs at the scene. Three have been euthanized
On Monday, April 9, 2012, the Genesee County Sheriff’s Department and Animal Control responded to 626 E. Bishop in Flint, Michigan. They found what was believed to be a bait dog in the home’s driveway. The animal was reported to have extensive injuries and could hardly stand up. Bait dogs are used to train dogs to fight. In one article that I read, the bait dog was a chocolate lab and it was later discovered that this animal had received the most extensive injuries, ranging from deep, severe wounds, multiple fractures and one injury that could only have been brought about by a human; having a blunt object shoved into his rectum. In the video of the seizure, the chocolate lab is unable to stand on his own and appears ready to die. His face is heart-breaking. Four other dogs have visible injuries; including cuts, bite marks, and a broken leg.
The home’s garage floor was said to have been covered in animal faeces and fresh patches of blood. A soiled mattress had been used as the fighting arena and fresh blood covered a dog cage. Authorities believe that the ringleader is a 14 year old boy who has been questioned. Sheriff Pickell said the boy was currently on a 180-day minimum suspension from school and that he had been kicked out of school at least 10 times in the past.

On Wednesday, April 11, 2012, Sheriff Pickell declared, "What we've got here is a serious dog fighting group." He made that statement as dogs were seized from another home in Flint, MI on the city's north side. This came two days after the five dogs were seized on Monday, April 9th from a home (626 E. Bishop) that was three doors down the block. Sheriff Pickell says those dogs seized on Monday were tortured and three of them had to be euthanized, while two others will be put up for adoption. The dogs seized on Wednesday came from the grandmother’s home. “One of the dogs that we brought out appeared to be nursing and our first impulse is to believe that they may be breeding these dogs,” Sheriff Pickell said.
According to Sheriff Pickell, the 14 year old boy was believed to be operating the ring in a garage behind his mother’s home. His mother was arrested Wednesday on unrelated warrants. The boy was released after hours of questioning, but the case is still under investigation as there could be more suspects and more dogs involved.

On Thursday, April 12, 2012, six of the seven dogs seized were to be returned to their owners because authorities said they don’t have enough evidence to hold them.
I have pieced together the above story from several different news sources in the Flint, MI area, in an effort to make the story as concise as possible. The following link is very difficult to read due to the graphic nature of the contents, but I urge you to do so in hopes that you will become as outraged, saddened, and horrified as I was upon discovering the gory details. http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2012/04/vet_releases_gory_report_in_do.html (Read story below article)

It is my hope that justice will be served in honour of these horribly abused animals and that measures will be taken to prevent the same from happening to those animals that were returned. The person/s who perpetrated these acts was a sadist and they do not deserve to be walking around free. Many reputable studies have clearly shown the connection between animal torturers and serial killers. If a 14 year old is responsible, then I hope he is tried as an adult. He is clearly very disturbed and needs to be incarcerated, along with those who were supposed to be responsible for him. Dog fighting, as one investigator put it, “is one-stop shopping for law enforcement” because it almost always involves illegal weapons, drugs, gambling, and is linked to many other crimes.
Animals have no voice, but we do. If we combine our collective voices, we will be heard loudly and clearly. Please sign this petition and respectfully ask Mr. David Leyton, the Prosecuting Attorney for Genesee County to see that this case is fully investigated and that any guilty parties are prosecuted to the fullest extent. Mr. Leyton can be reached at: 900 South Saginaw Street Flint, MI 48502 (810) 257-3210.

Here is the story
FLINT, MI -- Genesee County Sheriff Robert Pickell said a "gory report" by the county veterinarian showed that animals seized from a suspected dog fighting ring lived a violent life.

"It appears that torture is also an issue here," Pickell said.

Five dogs were
seized Monday from a home on East Bishop Avenue on Flint's north side after authorities found a "bait dog," or a dog used to train other fighting dogs, in the home's driveway.

Three of the animals, including the bait dog, have since
been euthanized.

One of the animals, a tan and white pit bull, had fresh bite wounds on both of its ears as well as deep bite wounds into its mouth, Pickell said. The animal also had three fractured ribs, which Pickell said is evidence the dog had been tortured and kicked.

A second pit bull had a fractured tibia that occurred more than three days ago.

The bait dog, a chocolate Labrador retriever, had the most extensive injuries, Pickell said.

The Lab had bite wounds throughout its body, with deep, severe wounds on its front legs. It also had a deep laceration along its shoulder, which was bleeding, and an open compound fracture of its humerus.

The base of the Lab's tail had multiple fractures that likely were inflicted by the other dogs biting and pulling the animal, Pickell said.

One injury on the Lab, however, was likely caused by human contact.

Pickell said an injury revealed that the animal was likely the victim of blunt force trauma when a foreign object was inserted into its rectum.

Genesee County Animal Control Chief Officer Walt Rodabaugh said Tuesday that two of the animals were unable to stand up and that the injuries the bait dog received were "just brutal."

Pickell said many of the injuries the dogs received are typically associated with dog fighting.

"Dog fight injuries typically occur on the front legs and face from sparring," Pickell said.

The other two dogs that were seized Monday will likely be put up for adoption, Pickell said.

Authorities also seized
five dogs and two puppies and the mother of a 14-year-old suspected of being involved with the dog fighting ring was taken in to custody on an unrelated warrant on Wednesday.

Pickell said his office is working to obtain warrants as its investigation continues.

Anyone with information on the case is asked to contact the Sheriff's Office at 810-257-3407.

Gary Ridley can be reached at 810-280-9516. You can also follow him on Twitter
@GaryRidley or on Facebook.


http://www.change.org/petitions/there-are-no-winners-in-a-dog-fight

Just another stray dog in someone's way


Los Angeles, CA: As cars speed by on their way to important destinations, one sweet Labrador retriever stands in the middle of the road by her friend. While onlookers do nothing, this sweet dog waits for help, help that never comes.

Someone did bother to call animal control, so now this beautiful soul is in the Baldwin Park Animal Care Centre with hundreds of other unwanted pets.

What a terrible comment about our society. What appointment was so urgent to take the life of an innocent animal? Did the person arrive on time at their destination? The person who hit and killed the Labrador's friend must have quite a personality to be so in demand. Two dogs, at least, have been removed from the Los Angeles streets so that busy people like the hit and run driver can get on with their lives.

In the meantime, this unwanted dog sits at a high kill shelter with the time clock ticking. These two animals are just stray dogs who got in the way. Imagine a world with no dogs at all….only people like the person who ran over this Labrador's friend so he could arrive five seconds faster.

http://www.examiner.com/article/just-another-stray-dog-someone-s-way

Cat tied up and chemically burned


On April 10th, it was reported by ABC 7 Action News that a burned cat had been discovered in Sterling Heights, Michigan. He had been found by residents in the area on April 5th, and what the people who found him saw was heartbreaking and horrifying. From all appearances, it looks like little Snow had his front legs bound together with a rope, and then had acid poured over him. He was limping, starving, terrified, and had horrific burns on his neck as well as his face.
After finally being able to trap little Snow, he was taken in by loving advocates at Paws for the Cause Feral Cat Rescue in Chesterfield Township, Michigan. The first veterinarian to see Snow said there was no way he could be brought back to health, because Snow was also found to have the Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV), which is the feline equivalent of AIDS in humans. But, these compassionate advocates simply would not take "no" for an answer



Cars Were Zooming Over Him: “I Had to Save This Puppy!”


When Yvette finished her day at a university in Bulgaria, she was weary from her studies but looking forward to spending the remainder of her day with friends. On the walk home, she was daydreaming about her plans when a car stopped at the side of the highway. This is never a good thing, and sure enough, the door opened and the driver threw a puppy into the road.

The car sped off and other cars approached and began passing right over the top of this tiny ball of black fur, whimpering in the road. It would be only a matter of seconds until tragedy struck. There simply wasn’t time to think, only to react.
“I felt instant fear,” Yvette said. “I had to stop the cars.”

Yvette quickly made her way onto the road, holding out her arms to stop the cars coming toward her. Drivers looked at her quizzically as they screeched to a stop. She knelt down just long enough to scoop up the puppy and then hurried back to the roadside with her heart pounding, and the puppy’s little heart doing the same.
The Bond Was Instant

“His little eyes were looking at me with such love as if he understood that I was his only hope in that crucial moment,” Yvette explained.
Yvette named her little bundle Nero and carried him home in her arms. But the minute Yvette came through the door cradling the puppy, her mother insisted that the puppy couldn’t stay as the family was still grieving over the recent death of their pet. A hard message to swallow, but thankfully Yvette chose to follow her own internal compass and find a way.

Without a place to keep Nero, Yvette wasn’t sure what to do. It was a long shot, but Yvette had heard of a rescue group named Colonel Angels Bulgarian Street Dogs and she phoned them straight away. Though the rescue is actually some 120 miles away, Yvette had to try and she almost couldn’t believe her ears when the voice on the other end of the phone said, “Yes, we will help.”
She was absolutely breathless with gratitude at this incredible offer. After all, the state of animal welfare in Bulgaria is still in its infancy and finding a rescue team to help is truly against all odds.

The Journey is Just Beginning
Yvette was asked to take Nero to a good local vet where his health was checked and kept for a few days until a foster home could be found. And though she was in tears when she said goodbye to Nero, Yvette knew that his life course had been dramatically altered and that she had truly saved his life.

Now, Nero has joined the Colonel Angel’s rescue program. This morning when I got in touch with the group’s co-founder Candy Sasse, she truly sounded weary.
“Our doorbell dogs are forever being dumped and abandoned,” Candy explained. “I had to take three in last week alone. We also have four puppies to rehome in Smolyan and have been asked to take another four from a neighboring village.”

Candy told me that Nero is actually guaranteed a new home in Holland and will make the journey once sufficient funds have been raised to send him on his way. It costs about $300 to cover his veterinary care, temporary housing and to send him to his new home.

I told Candy to hold on while I send her funds. After all, Colonel Angel’s is one of the core partners of the Harmony Fund and we look after our own. Outstanding costs for the care of all the dogs currently in hand is near $6,000 and the Harmony Fund is aiming to deliver at least half of that through it’s “World’s Biggest Baby Shower for Animals” and more than a few prayers have been whispered to find a way to pay the rest.

http://www.care2.com/causes/cars-were-zooming-over-him-i-had-to-save-this-puppy.html

Crippled Horse and Her Baby Saved from Auction Barn


Irene and Ali came into our rescue program unexpectedly one April evening. The date of their arrival was a very unusual one for me, as I found myself drawn to the Jones Livestock Auction. This is a very rare occasion for me, because I know that I can’t save them all and with the overwhelming number of cruelty cases that I get in, I just don’t have the funds to purchase horses. However, for reasons that are very clear to me today, I found myself walking through the livestock barn in Jones on this particular Thursday night viewing the horses. As I reached the last stall in the barn, I found this pair. Irene, a 17-year-old paint, had just given birth to her daughter Ali two days prior to being taken to the sale barn. This new-born filly was being exposed to all types of illnesses at the sale barn. And her mama was crippled, blind in one eye, had a huge abscess on the side of her face and was very underweight. Other than the fact that she didn’t like the other horses looking at her baby, she was just the sweetest girl and seemed to scream “help me!”

That was all I needed to see. I knew then that I was staying for the evening.
Irene was one of the last horses to come through the sale and not even the ‘kill buyer’ would bid on her. No one offered up a single bid, and then the auctioneer looked at us, since he knows who we are and what we do, and we immediately said, “Yes. Of course.” No one was willing to save this special momma and her baby, but we did so without hesitation.

They Came Home With Us
We brought them home and had our veterinarian examine them immediately. Baby Ali had diarrhoea and we were concerned for her life, as we know she was exposed to strangles (a highly contagious and serious infection). We immediately treated her for the diarrhoea and prayed that she would survive. Momma’s huge abscess turned out to be caused by strangles, so our veterinarian immediately drained the wound and flushed it out.

Irene was placed on antibiotics and the next several days were crucial. We watched over the two very closely and baby Ali started thriving, trying to eat with momma, growing and doing great.
Just one month later, Momma had gained 100 pounds and was just the sweetest girl you will ever meet, always greeting us with a friendly nicker. Ali began to run, buck, play and grow like a weed. In fact, Ali was almost as tall as her momma in just a few short weeks and quite a flashy girl.

We knew we had to find the right home for this pair with a family who would look past Irene’s handicap and offer her the loving, forever home that she and her foal so greatly deserved. After all, Irene didn’t ask to be put through all that she has. She only wanted someone to love her and her baby.
Today, Irene and Ali are living in Halstead, Kansas. They are well loved and spoiled rotten.

Ten Years of Saving Lives
Over the past 10 years, Blaze’s Tribute Equine Rescue has saved 841 horses and counting. Most of them have been victims of severe neglect or cruelty and the Cross family is devoted to nursing each horse back to health in body and soul.
As Blaze’s Tribute Equine Rescue is readying to receive more mothers and foals this spring, they’re counting on the World’s Biggest Baby Shower for Animals for help. This event brings together small but powerful rescue teams from around the world in a collective mission to save the animals others deem unreachable.

http://www.care2.com/causes/crippled-mama-horse-and-baby-saved-from-auction-barn.html

Monday, April 2, 2012

Kristin Bauer Speaks Out for Tony the Tiger

Kristin Bauer, the actress who portrays the lovely-but-lethal vampire Pam on HBO's award-winning True Blood, has teamed with the Animal Legal Defense Fund in the fight to free Tony, a Siberian-Bengal tiger who has been living in isolation as a "tourist attraction" at the Tiger Truck Stop in Grosse Tete, Louisiana for the past decade. More at http://www.aldf.org/Tony

Here is the video on YouTube :